In the latest report, the remaining 1% of attention can include unpublished topics and podcasts with no qualifying discussion.
2 topics highlighted · Sep 28–Oct 4, 2026
Select a topic or a dated dot to see its history below.
Swipe to follow the full timeline →
Direction compares the latest report with recent weeks; small changes are “About the same,” and gaps mean no measurement.
Regulation · 5.1% · Aug 3–9, 2026 · About the same in the latest report
Regulation
Laws, rules, and government decisions about how AI may be built and used.
Aug 3–9, 2026
5.1%About the sameUp 1.7 percentage points from last week
Choose a week to read the discussion.— Below threshold
Show this week’s discussionHide this week’s discussionPodcast moments and context
Regulation · Aug 3–9, 2026
A closer read
What changed
Its share rose from 3.4% to 5.1%, with evidence across 7 podcasts.
Where it showed up
It appeared in episodes including “#229: Q3 Trends Briefing - The Pope's AI Encyclical, AI Agents Hack Hugging Face, Fable 5 vs. Washington, and the Battle Over Open Weights” and “Why the Data Center Fight Has Little to Do With AI”.
How to read it
6 cited episodes from 5 podcasts are shown below. The topic appeared across 7 podcasts in the full analysis.
Podcast moments from the week
8 quoted moments · 6 episodes · 5 podcasts
The Artificial Intelligence Show
#229: Q3 Trends Briefing - The Pope's AI Encyclical, AI Agents Hack Hugging Face, Fable 5 vs. Washington, and the Battle Over Open Weights
“Trump called government stakes in the labs a beautiful thing that would make Americans partners in this revolution. So, Paul, like, just a simple question here, but like, maybe I'm sure a very complicated answer. Is the U.S. government going to nationalize AI labs in some fash...”
“if the AI was doing something that would be illegal and a crime if a human was doing it with malice, then the AI developer is strictly liable for that”
“I'm just making the point that it would have to be a mandate. It would have to be enforced by the governments, especially CCP, and they would have to enforce it in an intelligent way that they were capable of understanding that it had to be done in a way that it couldn't be re...”
“it's a problem of writing legislation to the specific technology, not only will it get outdated, but it doesn't deal with a higher level of principle.”